This [I agree the architecture is not specific to MUWS.] contradicts
[Which is why I think it makes sense to call it the MUWS architecture.]
:)
The change does affect a lot of wording in MOWS concepts section and I
don't want to revisit it at this point.
I believe it is the WSDM architecture and spec partitioning is our own
internal kitchen which must not affect the reason why we have this TC in
the first place!
This may seem to be minor to some, but it is not to me. So I'd like to
insist that we recall that change in MUWS part 1.
-- Igor Sedukhin .. (igor.sedukhin@ca.com)
-- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11749
-----Original Message-----
From: Vambenepe, William N [mailto:vbp@hp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:05 PM
To: Sedukhin, Igor S; Mark Ellison
Cc: Wsdm (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [wsdm] Groups - wd-wsdm-muws-part1-1.0-20041118.doc
uploaded
I agree the architecture is not specific to MUWS. It applies to MOWS
too. It actually applies to everything that uses MUWS, including MOWS.
Which is why I think it makes sense to call it the MUWS architecture. It
is the architecture introduced by MUWS and used by every spec that is
based on MUWS, including but not limited to MOWS.
Any other opinions? At the end I don't think this materially affects the
spec so it's not a big deal. I'd like to hear what others think and I'll
put in the spec whatever the group likes best.
William
-----Original Message-----
From: Sedukhin, Igor S [mailto:Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 7:17 PM
To: Vambenepe, William N; Mark Ellison
Cc: Wsdm (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [wsdm] Groups - wd-wsdm-muws-part1-1.0-20041118.doc
uploaded
I do not agree to replace WSDM for MUWS in the concepts an architecture
section. This change has been just introduced and was not in the Mark's
edits. I believe that these concepts apply to all of the work and
specifications produced by WSDM and are not specific to MUWS only. I'd
like to recall this change.
-- Igor Sedukhin .. (igor.sedukhin@ca.com)
-- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11749
-----Original Message-----
From: Vambenepe, William N [mailto:vbp@hp.com]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 10:09 PM
To: Sedukhin, Igor S; Mark Ellison
Cc: Wsdm (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [wsdm] Groups - wd-wsdm-muws-part1-1.0-20041118.doc
uploaded
In the doc I just posted (minutes before this reply came) I replaces
"manageability representation" with "manageability endpoint". This seems
correct to me (by our definition a manageability endpoint is specific to
one resource) and avoids repeating the more heavy "implementation of a
manageable resource". Let me know if someone thinks this is a problem.
I second Igor's thanks to Mark for the great review. Since I expect as
many corrections to Part 2 I am holding off from further work on Part 2
until I get Mark's review otherwise it will be merge hell.
William
-----Original Message-----
From: Sedukhin, Igor S [mailto:Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 7:04 PM
To: Mark Ellison; Vambenepe, William N
Cc: Wsdm (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [wsdm] Groups - wd-wsdm-muws-part1-1.0-20041118.doc
uploaded
Great comments, Mark. Looks much better now.
[resource-type-specific] I think it was actually better as
[resource-specific]. Avoids introduction of unnecessary concepts early
on.
That is, if printer management is printer-specific or
printer-type-specific, I don't know...
Good that you noticed: in 5.3.1 a [manageability representation]. Where
did that come from? We have never defined one in the architecture or
terminology sections. I agree that this should be implementation of a
manageable resource as your comment says.
-- Igor Sedukhin .. (igor.sedukhin@ca.com)
-- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11749
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Ellison [mailto:ellison@ieee.org]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 9:06 PM
To: vbp@hp.com
Cc: Wsdm (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [wsdm] Groups - wd-wsdm-muws-part1-1.0-20041118.doc
uploaded
Hi William,
Here are my editoral comments for MUWS-part1. Hopefully, I'll work
through part two by this time tomorrow...
Regards,
Mark
vbp@hp.com wrote:
The document wd-wsdm-muws-part1-1.0-20041118.doc has been submitted by
William Vambenepe (vbp@hp.com) to the OASIS Web Services Distributed
Management (WSDM) TC document repository.
Document Description:
Part 1 has a complete draft with no pending AI or TODO. Thanks for
reviewing.
Download Document:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/download.php/10177/wd
-wsdm-muws-part1-1.0-20041118.doc
View Document Details:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/document.php?document
_id=10177
PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email
application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able
to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of
your web browser.
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster
of the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/members/leave_workgrou
p.php.
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/members/leave_workgrou
p.php.
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/members/leave_workgroup.php.