[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Here is the MUWS document with my editorial markup
ok, you're right on this. I will take care of this in the
next revision today.
-- Igor
Sedukhin
..
(igor.sedukhin@ca.com) From: Andrea Westerinen [mailto:andreaw@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 2:22 AM To: Sedukhin, Igor S; wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: Here is the MUWS document with my editorial markup Igor, I would like MOWS to extend MUWS and not change
it. Therefore, you wouldn't change the inheritance hierarchy, but add to
it. Your words are right, but I interpret them differently in UML.
When you say the resource is a WS endpoint, you are really saying that the
endpoint takes on the properties / associations / characteristics of a
resource - that makes endpoint the subclass. This leaves resource as a
general abstraction, but in the case of MOWS says that the endpoint IS-A kind
of a resource. I really can't see it as the other way
round.
Andrea
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]