RE: [wsdm] Interop: more precision

["Springer, Ian P." <ian.springer@hp.com>]

This reminds me, while going over the interop doc a couple days ago, I
noticed that section 2 lists the 2004/03 wsa namespace, but it should
instead list the 2003/03 namespace, since this is the version used by
the versions of WSRF/WSN that are referenced by MUWS 1.0. I also
recommend using "wsa03" and "wsa04" as the prefixes for the two WSA
namespaces to improve readability of the doc.

Another thought I had is that, for better coverage, the Correlateable
Properties act should also use pbm:MatchAny and/or pbm:MatchAll in the
pbm query.

Ian

----- 

	Igor,
	 
	I don't understand why we need to make the following assertions:
	        reax and indicate that S:mustUnderstand MUST not be
indicated on WSA headers 
	        wsdl-soap:headers MUST NOT be decalred for any WSA
headers 
	
	It seems to me that normal SOAP or WSDL processing would handle
these cases just fine.
		 
	Also, I am not sure if it is stated or not, but we should be
sure to say that endpoints must accept messages for at least the WSA
versions of 2003/02 and 2004/08 of SOAP headers.
	 	 		 
	Bryan
		
________________________________

	From: Sedukhin, Igor S [mailto:Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com] 
	Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 8:16 AM
	To: wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
	Subject: [wsdm] Interop: more precision
	
	

	I think to make it easier for us to interop we need to state
this in the interop document: 
	        
	        SOAP 1.1 MUST be used 
	        SOAP 1.1 over HTTP MUST be used as described in
http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/#_Toc478383526
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/#_Toc478383526>  
	        HTTP 1.1 or 1.0 MUST be used
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616 <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616>  
	        reax and indicate that S:mustUnderstand MUST not be
indicated on WSA headers 
	        move up to WS-I BP 1.1
http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1-2004-08-24.html
<http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1-2004-08-24.html>  
	        
	        if WSDL is provided 
	                WSDL 1.1 MUST be used 
	                wsdl-soap:headers MUST NOT be decalred for any
WSA headers 
	        
	        when WSA is used to send a message 
	                Only syncronous HTTP messaaging MUST be intended
i.e. 
	                        wsa:ReplyTo or (wsa:From if wsa:ReplyTo
is absent) MUST either be absent or indicate wsa:Address -> anonymous
role URI

	        when WSA 2004/08 version is used 
	                wsa:ReferenceParameters MUST not be included in
EPRs 

	I think this will facilitate the interop as it is all about
proper composition of the standards. Too many variations may get us
troubleshooting basic WS infrastructure most of the time.

	-- Igor Sedukhin .. (igor.sedukhin@ca.com
<mailto:igor.sedukhin@ca.com> )
	-- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11749