RE: [wsdm] A typo in wsdm-muws-part2.wsdl

["Vambenepe, William N" <vbp@hp.com>]

Good catch, thanks Zhili. You're right that because of the fact that few
people will implement just the properties from this portType it won't
cause a problem in the portType aggregation case. But should still be in
an errata.

The question is whether to fix the WSDL or the XSD. Based on the name of
the capability, ("relationships") I think the WSDL is logically right
and the XSD should have a "s" added. So we should make the fix in the
XSD (from RelationshipResourceProperties to
RelationshipsResourceProperties). The question is then to also change
the name of the type from RelationshipResourcePropertiesType to
RelationshipsResourcePropertiesType. The change is not needed, but would
make sense logically.

So what does it mean to make this an errata? Obviously we don't change
the spec PDF but we add this in the errata doc. But can we change the
stand-alone XSD doc? My take it yes, that we should.

Regards,

William

-----Original Message-----
From: zhili@tibco.com [mailto:zhili@tibco.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 7:51 PM
To: wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsdm] A typo in wsdm-muws-part2.wsdl

Hi,

In "Relationships" portType of wsdm-muws-part2.wsdl
(http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsdm/2004/12/muws/wsdm-muws-part2.wsdl), the
QName value for attribute "wsrf-rp:ResourceProperties" is
"muws-p2-xs:RelationshipsProperties". However, in wsdm-muws-part2.xsd
(http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsdm/2004/12/muws/wsdm-muws-part2.xsd),
there is no such element "RelationshipsProperties" defined (Note the "s"
after "Relationship"). The actual property document element should be
"muws-p2-xs:RelationshipProperties".

I do not think this will affect interop because most service
designers/implementers will aggregate portTypes into a single flat
portType (following recommendation from WSRF-RP) in their final WSDL
document. But it needs be corrected in an errata.

Thanks
Zhili Zhang
TIBCO Software Inc.