RE: [wsdm] [interop] MOWS Manageability References Act

["Sedukhin, Igor S" <Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>]

Ok, URL is fine, but WSDL is needed for the binding info. Not to say that it is HTTP over SOAP anyways... but...

 

-- Igor Sedukhin .. (igor.sedukhin@ca.com)
-- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11749

 

---

From: David Melgar [mailto:dmelgar@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 5:48 PM
To: Sedukhin, Igor S
Cc: Campana Jr., Salvatore J; wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsdm] [interop] MOWS Manageability References Act

We're planning on supporting 
GetManageabilityReferences given the URL to a web service. If we can easily 
manually extract the URL from the WSDL then thats ok, I'd rather not get into 
testing variations of WSDL parsing. 

David Melgar
Web Services Toolkit Development
Emerging 
Technologies
dmelgar@us.ibm.com

"Sedukhin, Igor S" <Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>

03/30/2005 05:30 PM

To	"Campana Jr., Salvatore J" <sal.campana@hp.com>, <wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	RE: [wsdm] [interop] MOWS Manageability References Act

WSDL, but I wouldn't oppose to remove this act altogether 
:).


-- Igor Sedukhin .. 
(igor.sedukhin@ca.com)
-- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 
11749

-----Original Message-----
From: 
Campana Jr., Salvatore J [mailto:sal.campana@hp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 
30, 2005 10:53 AM
To: wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsdm] [interop] 
MOWS Manageability References Act



I 
wanted to suggest that the first step of the MOWS Manageability
References 
Act be more explicit in that it should be EITHER a WSDL
description OR an EPR 
as the starting point.....not both...

The 
way it reads, it implies you need to handle both scenarios as a
client 
because vendor A is providing an EPR and vendor b is providing a
WSDL 
url....

While it may be fair to say clients 
should handle both, the act (I
think) is not about "how" the request 
originates, but rather the
response of the GetManageabilityReferences 
operation...

I'm fine with starting from the 
WSDL or an EPR, I just think we should
mandate only one for this act to avoid 
potential problems during the
event.....but I'm open to others opinions 
;-)

-S

--------------------
Sal Campana

HP Software Engineer

phone: 
856.638.6284
email: sal.campana@hp.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To 
unsubscribe, e-mail: wsdm-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional 
commands, e-mail: 
wsdm-help@lists.oasis-open.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To 
unsubscribe, e-mail: wsdm-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional 
commands, e-mail: 
wsdm-help@lists.oasis-open.org