RE: [wsdm] Comment on MUWS part 1 and 2

["Vaughn Bullard" <vbullard@amberpoint.com>]

OK, 

Now I'm getting heartburn.

Vaughn

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Wilson, Kirk D [mailto:Kirk.Wilson@ca.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:03 AM
To: Mitsunori Satomi; wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsdm] Comment on MUWS part 1 and 2

Mitsunori-san:

I think we need to discuss the LastUpdated problem on the conf. call.
You're right the text doesn't say anything explicitly about the requirements
for using the LastUpdated attribute.  But the definition of Duration
attribute is defined as the internval previous to the LastUpdated time,
which might implicitly imply that the LastUpdated attribute must be
provided.  A similar "implicit" implication might be read into
PointinTime--what was the point in time that the data represents.  But
you're right, given the way the spec was written, LastUpdated would be just
recommended.

Good catch on the <wsnt:Filter> tag.  Damn, now I'm going to have to review
the old WSN spec and completely revise the text on pp 31-32--only to
probably include the text all over again the WSDM 1.1 version of the Primer.
Have you and your colleagues found any other such examples.

Kirk Wilson
Architect, Development
Office of the CTO
603 823-7146
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mitsunori Satomi [mailto:Mitsunori.Satomi@hds.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:53 PM
To: wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsdm] Comment on MUWS part 1 and 2

Hi,

I found some typos and comment in the spec documents.

1. MUWS Part1 (KDW wsdm-muws-part1-1[1][1][1].0-vjb-tws-me.doc)
 - P5L134 "a group of properties-operations," should be "a group of
properties, operations,"

2. MUWS Part2 (KDW wsdm-muws-part2-1[1][1].0-vjb-changesaccepted.doc)
 - P29L1135 "/muws1:ResourceID" should be "/muws1:ResourceId".

3. MUWS Primer (wd-wsdm-primer-muws-wd_final.doc)
 - P40L1896 This table shows "LastUpdated" attribute is "REQUIRED" if
TimeScope="Interval" or "PointInTime".
                   But MUWS spec Part2 does not describe anything about this
attribute is required or not.
                   So IMHO, I suggest that we should change these two
columns from "REQUIRED"(checked mark) to "recommended".

And my colleagues in Japan are worried about the consistency between Primer
documents and other related specs (WSRF, WSN and WS-Addressing).
For example, at the MOWS Primer document P13L566, this sample XML text use
<wsnt:Filter> tag, but I think that WSN Jun. 2004 version spec doesn't have
such XML tag.
(<wsnt:Filter> is a tag of new version of WSN).

IMHO after WSDM 1.1 is adopted, we should update the both Primer documents
which have consistency with the related specifications, or we should
synchronize the Primer and MUWS / MOWS spec. in the next version (WSDM
2.0?).
 
I am so sorry for sending our comments later.
----
Mitsunori SATOMI (mailto:Mitsunori.Satomi@hds.com)
  Director, Advanced Software Architect, SD-US
    Hitachi Data Systems Corporation
      Office: +1-408-970-4385 / Fax: +1-408-327-3351


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php