wsfed message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: [wsfed] WSFED TC Minutes, August 21, 2007 - rev 1
- From: Mike Kaiser <mkaiser@us.ibm.com>
- To: "wsfed@lists.oasis-open.org" <wsfed@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:00:08 -0400
WSFED TC Minutes, August 21, 2007 -
Revision 1
Revision 1: (EMK updated 8/21)
Corrected
to indicate that Tony Gullata was present at the WSFED TC meeting.
Summary of new Action Items:
AI-2007-08-21-01 - TC Membership needs
to review the FAQ that Hal Lockhart has
submitted for i006 and Don's response
for i008 and be prepared to take a
positions for both at the next meeting.
1. Call to order/roll call
Meeting called to order.
-
Verify Minute Taker
Marc Goodner
volunteered (Thanks Marc!! Mike Kaiser
joined
late and picked up the remaining minute taking)
- Roll Call
Status
Changes:
1.
Gained Voting Status
Jeff Bohren, BMC
2.
Lost Voting Status
Robin
Martherus, Ping Identity
3.
No people left on LOA
Attendance:
Hal Lockhart;BEA Systems, Inc.
Denis Pilipchuk;BEA Systems, Inc.
Jeff Bohren;BMC Software*
Yakov Sverdlov;CA*
Mike Kaiser;IBM
Michael McIntosh;IBM
Anthony Nadalin;IBM
James Hosmer;Lockheed Martin*
Larry Rogers;Lockheed Martin*
Marc Goodner;Microsoft Corporation
Chris Kaler;Microsoft Corporation
Arun Nanda;Microsoft Corporation
Don Schmidt;Microsoft Corporation
Norman Brickman;Mitre Corporation*
Abbie Barbir;Nortel
Paul Knight;Nortel
Lloyd Burch;Novell*
Steve Carter;Novell*
Doug Earl;Novell*
Rich Levinson;Oracle Corporation
Anil Saldhana;Red Hat
Tony Gullata;SOA
Software Inc.
Gerry Woods;SOA Software Inc.
Don Adams;TIBCO Software Inc.
David Staggs;Veterans Health Administration
2. Reading/Approving minutes of last meeting (Aug 07, 2007 )):
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsfed/email/archives/200708/msg00003.html
Approved unanimously.
3. TC Logistics (10 minutes or less)
- Reminder: Next Meeting in 3 weeks (September 11)
- Reminder: Use extra time to progress Actions
and Issues 4. Issues list.
4. Issues list
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsfed/issues/Issues.xml
a) Review of action items
None.
b) Issues in Review status
None.
c) New issues
i009 - Use of ds:KeyInfo
in fed:TokenSigningKeyInfo Element
Membership
agreement that this issue was pretty much clear cut as
document and should be assigned to editors.
Issue Action: Change
to pending and assign to editors.
i010 - Number 10:
Conformance clauses:
General
agreement reached to re-title this section and change the
double negative wording as suggested in the
issue write-up. Mike
Kaiser indicated that there were some additional
editorial changes
that he would like to suggest. It was
agreed that he would work
with the editors to update the wording for
review at next meeting.
Issue Action: Change to pending and assign
to editors.
i011 - Add claims
dialect.... to federation metadata.
Membership
agreed that this one seems straight forward and no
objections raised to the suggested resolution.
Issue Action: Change
to pending and assign to editors
d) Active issues
i004 - Transitive closure spec dependencies
In progress. Marc
anticipates having something by next call.
i005 - Complex claim data types
Tony Nadalin indicated
that this was still in progress.
i006 - WSFED FAQ
Hal submitted
a draft FAQ for consideration.
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsfed/email/archives/200708/msg00010.html
General
consensus was that it looks great. Will need to move to
issues page and then put link on main page
so that it is publically
viewable once approved.
Issue
Action: Place in Review State. ACTION ITEM: TC Members
should
review Hal's submission in preparation for
vote for approval at the
next meeting.
i007 - Claim Type references
Marc
and Don did talk about this. Basically since claims are typed by
URI there was a question of 'are the claim
type URI's guaranteed to
resolve?'. ANSWER: No. The WSFED
spec can't change this since this
is clearly outside the control scope.
Therefore, this issue should
be ultimately be closed by updating the spec
with an editorial comment/
clarification that explicitly states out of
spec. and that URI's are
not guaranteed to resolve. Issue Action:
Leave as pending and assign
to the editors.
i008 - Sign-out notification and priority
Both
Mary and Don appended response (duplicate). Paul had some good
observations. Two areas of spec are
ambiguous about signout. One
necessary...agree with observations.
Will add some clarification.
There are numerous situations where "require"
can't be done. Priority
should be addressed/assessed by membership.
Because no formal response
to Don's posting has been received, Issue
Action: Leave open until next
call.
f) Pending issues
None.
5. AOB
None.
6. Adjournment
Motion made and approved to adjourn.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]