RE: [wsia] OASIS-W3C relationships for WSIA

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

Title: RE: [wsia] OASIS-W3C relationships for WSIA

I concur. I have followed the discussion of XMLP on xml-dev and it has fizzled for lack of controversy or specifics I imagine, but it may solve the one aspect of Web Services for which I have yet to find the appropriate forum, mainly that we need a way to pre-secure the channels for a set of services or at least check them and make sure that the channels are open and available for transmission before a full session is engaged. For the simplest embedded, or fire-and-forget use cases from wsia producers it is not a problem, but onward from that point it becomes problematic in a range from minor to absolute.

Ciao,

Rex

At 10:07 AM -0500 4/4/02, Eilon Reshef wrote:

> I would add XMLP, just in case we have some
> requirements around transport of HTML documents, around
> meta-definitions and interface support, etc.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Charles F Wiecha [mailto:wiecha@us.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:49 AM
> > To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [wsia] OASIS-W3C relationships for WSIA
> >
> > Folks -- here's my draft response to Karl
> > around potential liaison
> > relationships between WSIA and W3C...please post any
> > comments or
> > suggestions for additions. I need to get back to him
> > later on today.
> > Thanks, Charlie
> > ----------------------------------------------
> > Karl -- in addition to the Web Services
> > Architecture WG, it would be useful
> > for WSIA to have relationships with the following W3C
> > working groups and
> > activities:. (1) XFORMS, (2) on-going work around
> > XLINK or other approaches
> > to separating linking from documents, and XPOINTER, 
> > (3) XPATH, and (5)
> > multimodal interaction.
> > Our work will draw more broadly from other
> > working groups, such as Schema,
> > SOAP, DOM, HTML and so on, but we can probably track
> > those groups without
> > the need for a more formal liaison
> > relationship.
> > Charlie Wiecha
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:20 AM
> > To: chairs
> > Subject: [chairs] relations with W3C
> >
> > Chairs:
> > The managements of OASIS and of W3C have
> > been in conversation the last
> > couple of months about how the two organizations could
> > better be working
> > together. As part of our discussions W3C has asked for
> > specific problems
> > or concerns that should be addressed.
> > In preparation for our next meeting at the
> > end of next week I would like
> > to hear from any of the OASIS TCs that now have or
> > could have a liaison
> > relationship with a W3C working group or activity, or
> > whose technical
> > work in some way overlaps or relates to their
> > work.
> > Please let me know what specific issues
> > your TC may have including but
> > not limited to obstacles to working together,
> > divergent goals, IP
> > issues, scheduling issues, what groups you need to
> > work with, etc.
> >
> > </karl>
> > =================================================================
> > Karl F. Best
> > OASIS - Director, Technical Operations
> > +1 978.667.5115 x206
> > karl.best@oasis-open.org  http://www.oasis-open.org
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the
> > subscription
> > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

--