[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: WSIA 5/9/2002: [wsia][wsia-requirements][E924]
No, only that the discovery mechanism may not be via UDDI. Suggestions? Thanks. Monica J. Martin Program Manager Drake Certivo, Inc. 208.585.5946 -----Original Message----- From: Rich Thompson Sent: Thu 5/9/2002 8:03 AM To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: Subject: Re: WSIA 5/8/2002: [wsia][wsia-requirements][E924] Do we really want to mandate that Services may not require specific discovery mechanisms?? I think the standard should not require specific discovery mechanisms, but specific implementations/deployments should be allowed to add such restrictions. "Monica Martin" <mmartin@certivo. To: Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, net> <wsia@lists.oasis-open.org> cc: 05/08/2002 11:57 Subject: WSIA 5/8/2002: [wsia][wsia-requirements][E924] PM Suggest: Services MUST be available independent of any specific discovery mechanism. Thanks. Monica -----Original Message----- From: Rich Thompson Sent: Mon 5/6/2002 12:19 PM To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: Subject: RE: [wsia][wsia-requirements][E924] Currently: An alternative to UDDI SHOULD be available to request a service description. Rewrite to be discovery-agnostic: RT. How about: The specification MUST be independent of any specific discovery mechanism. ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: < http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: < http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC