WSIA 5/18/2002: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R130]

[Monica Martin <mmartin@certivo.net>]

Yes, I understand how you could see that.
 
The capability should exist for a Consumer to consume both a statefuland
stateless WSIA Web Service.

Does this more so capture the intent?  Comments welcome.

Monica


	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Rich Thompson 
	Sent: Fri 5/17/2002 5:57 AM 
	To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Re: WSIA 5/16/2002: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R130]
	
	


	This sounds to me like a requirement on the Consumers, while I
think the
	intent is the the specifications must allow consumers these
choices.
	
	
	
	
"Monica Martin"
<mmartin@certivo.        To:       Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS,
net>                      <wsia@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc:                                                                 
	                      05/16/2002 09:15         Subject:  WSIA
5/16/2002: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R130]           
	                      AM
This is what I had proposed in some rewrites sent recently:
	
	
	A Consumer SHOULD be able to consume both a statefuland
stateless WSIA
	Web Service.
	
	
	
	M2: Note:  I feel the mechanism is not particularly necessary
unless
	boundaries need to be defined by another requirement
	
	If we need to expand on boundaries, everyone pitch in.
	
	Thank you.
	Monica J. Martin
	Program Manager
	Drake Certivo, Inc.
	208.585.5946
	
	             -----Original Message-----
	             From: Rich Thompson
	             Sent: Wed 5/15/2002 2:37 PM
	             To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
	             Cc:
	             Subject: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R130]
	
	
	
	             Originally:
	
	                   A Consumer should be able to consume both a
stateful
	WSIA
	Web Service
	                   and a stateless one. If needed, this
specification
	should
	define the
	                   mechanism that allows the Consumer to support
both
	cases.
	
	
	                   Rewrite as one simple requirement: SR, RT,
MM, TC, GT.
	Do
	not use
	                   "session", no recursive "lifecycle"
definitions -
	instead
	"for the
	                   duration of..". Allow for Consumers that
consume only
	stateful or
	                   stateless services.
	
	
	
	
	
	                   How about:
	
	
	                   This specification MUST allow a Consumer to
consume only
	stateful
	                   WSIA Producers, only stateless WSIA Producers
or both.
	
	
	
	
	
	                   The comment may have implied combining in
R129 - 131,
	but
	I have no
	                   clear recollection of that intent.
	
	
	
	
	
	----------------------------------------------------------------
	             To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the
	subscription
	             manager: < http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	----------------------------------------------------------------
	To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
	manager: < http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>