wsia message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp][wsia][wsrp-wsia joint interfaces][Draft Spec 0.43]Shar edTransient Information
- From: Gil Tayar <Gil.Tayar@webcollage.com>
- To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org, wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 07:45:39 +0300
In the interest of sanity
and progress, I have broken up Rich's, Michael's, Monica's and Eilon's emails
into four subjects - "Shared Transient Information", "Persistent Information
Scope", "createEntity/createTemplate/createPortlet", "session and entity
handles", and "Property lists".
This email will deal with
Shared Transient Information, and the relevant quotes from the
emails and my reply to them:
Rich
wrote:
> This is a concept that
has been brought up both in the WSRP discussions and
> the Coordinated Use
case of WSIA (deferred for now). The discussion we had
> on Tuesday had general
agreement that this would be Consumer supplied
> functionality that
Producers would not need to even know was occurring. I
> think people still need
to think through this, but hopefully we can make it
> a decision point
soon.
Michael
wrote:
> 1) I agree we should
ignore the shared transient information "type".
So Gil now
writes:
Well, it seems we're in the
direction of dropping "shared transient state" from the draft spec (at least for
v1.0), and having our first resolution on the draft spec
:->! I second this, as I think our interfaces in their first shot
must be minimal, and this issue is a difficult and unclear one. Final
objections, anybody?
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC