[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp][wsia][wsrp-wsia joint interfaces][Draft Spec 0.43] Sha redTransient Information
I would agree to that. "Shared Transient Information" would introduce a lot
of additional problems especially when introducing parallel rendering. In
this case a special locking mechanism would have to be defined to avoid
inconsistent session state.
Best regards
Carsten Leue
-------
Dr. Carsten Leue
Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory Böblingen , Germany
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Gil Tayar |
| | <Gil.Tayar@webcol|
| | lage.com> |
| | |
| | 05/22/2002 05:31 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to|
| | Gil Tayar |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org, wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org |
| cc: |
| Subject: RE: [wsrp][wsia][wsrp-wsia joint interfaces][Draft Spec 0.43] Sha red Transient Information |
| |
| |
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I agree. If nobody objects, I will remove the "Shared Transient
Information"
sections to a "future directions" place in the document, which will leave
us
with "User Transient Information" and "Persistent Information".
Gil
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 18:02
To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org; wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsrp][wsia][wsrp-wsia joint interfaces][Draft Spec 0.43]
Shared Transient Information
This is a concept that has been brought up both in the WSRP discussions and
the Coordinated Use case of WSIA (deferred for now). The discussion we had
on Tuesday had general agreement that this would be Consumer supplied
functionality that Producers would not need to even know was occurring. I
think people still need to think through this, but hopefully we can make it
a decision point soon.
Gil Tayar
<Gil.Tayar@webcol To:
wsia@lists.oasis-open.org, wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
lage.com> cc:
Subject:
[wsrp][wsia][wsrp-wsia joint interfaces][Draft Spec 0.43]
05/22/2002 09:34
AM
I updated the "LifeCycle/Requirements" section of ths draft spec according
to the meeting.
I tried to put some structure around the issues we revolved around in the
meeting, so I hope I didn't step on anybody's terminological or conceptual
toes.
I think we should try and agree on requirements and terminology of this
section by the next meeting, if we hope to get a draft spec rolling
anytime soon. This means commenting on this section of the draft ASAP via
the mailing list, and trying to reach some kind of a closure. I will try
and gather our comments and (hopefully!) resolutions back into the
document by the next meeting. In the interest of focus, if you have a
comment, please pre-pend it with the above subject and put one
comment/issue/resolution per email. For example:
Subject: [wsrp][wsia][wsrp-wsia joint interfaces][Draft Spec 0.43]The
"Session" term
Cheers,
Gil Tayar
WebCollage
#### WSIA-WSRP Joint Spec Draft 0.43.doc has been removed from this note on
May 22 2002 by Rich Thompson
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC