RE: [wsia][wsrp-interfaces] expires as a timestamp rather than an int

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

The timeout with a timestamp seems like a good and easy solution for this.

It should make it loggable for troubleshooting.

At 4:45 PM -0700 7/15/02, Alan Kropp wrote:
>I don't understand what a timestamp accomplishes on its own.  The same
>network latency that eats up the timeout could overtake the timestamp, and
>then what is the Producer supposed to do?  Maybe it should be a timestamp
>_and_ a timeout?
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
>Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:58 AM
>To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org; wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: [wsia][wsrp-interfaces] expires as a timestamp rather than an
>int
>
>
>
>expires was originally proposed with a type definition. I would agree that
>a timestamp would be better than it actually referring to a duration.
>
>
>
>
>
>                       "Tamari, Yossi"
>
>                       <yossi.tamari@sap        To:
>wsia@lists.oasis-open.org,                                
>                       .com>
>wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org                               
>                                                cc:
>
>                       07/15/2002 12:47         Subject:  RE:
>[wsia][wsrp-interfaces] Refactoring the data objects  
>                       PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>See my comments marked with [YT].
>(Most of them are in appendix A, since it seems appendix a is the real
>definition of the spec, which I think is wrong, and is a result of what
>Rich mentioned below about the obscurity of the interface.)
>
>The endless debate about putting WSIA concepts in the WSRP standard is
>still there...
>
>       Yossi.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
>Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:09 PM
>To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org; wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: [wsia][wsrp-interfaces] Refactoring the data objects
>
>
>As requested in Tuesday's Joint interfaces call, I have reworked the draft
>spec in an effort to factor the data items into the scopes presented at the
>June F2F. Personally I think this obscures too much and that some of the
>data items should move up to first class parameters in the interface.
>Hopefully this version can provide a reasonable basis for a discussion of
>which items should be promoted either for clarity or as part of supporting
>any factoring of the operations.
>
>Technical note: In order to make this readable but yet leave an indication
>of what was modified, I accepted the changes and then appended a space on
>the end of changed lines so that a change bar will appear on the left. So
>much changed in Appendix A that it all should be considered modified.
>
>(See attached file: WSIA - WSRP Interface Specification.doc)
>
>
>
>
>#### WSIA - WSRP Interface Specification1.doc has been removed from this
>note on July 15 2002 by Rich Thompson
>
>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>


--