[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Inconsistencies in WSN references
I have found the following inconsistencies in the use of references in the PR 1 drafts.. BaseNotification line 28. The abstract contains a self-referential [WS-BaseNotification], but thre is (unsurprisingly) no such reference in section 8. The [] should be removed. line 29 The reference to WS-Topics in the abstract does not have []. It should do line 172. Refers to [WSDL 2.0] but this has been removed from the references section. I suggest we remove the [WSDL 2.0] line 395. First mention of WS-ResourceProperties; it should have [] line 578. First mention of XPATH, there should be an [XPATH] reference line 654. First mention of WS-ResourceLifetime; it should have [] Section 8.1 (Normative References) This should include a reference to WS-BaseFaults BrokeredNotification line 150. Refers to [WSDL 2.0] but this has been removed from the references section - resolve as for BaseNotification line 334. First mention of WS-ResourceProperties; it should have [] Section 9.1 (Normative References) The reference to XPATH is never used, This should be removed Peter Niblett
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]