[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsqm] about illustration of quality model
Eric, As no one was against your
opinion, I revised a diagram of quality model. Technical Support Group, Junior Consultant Tel +82 2 858 2212 (Ext 300) Mobile +82 2 16 808 9755 Email jkchoi@methodi.com From: Jiyong Eric Pyon ( JK, Sorry for the late feedback.
Good drawing, although I
want to point out something. I am not quiet sure if it¡¯s
necessary to indicate ¡®uses¡¯, ¡®guarantees¡¯, ¡®performs¡¯ along
with lines because with these labels, this drawing is more like an instance
among quality factor, quality activity and quality associate rather than
showing general relationship among them. I think we are casting unnecessary
constraints on this drawing by labeling and closing out all the other possible
actions that could occur between them. I think just the direction of arrow
would be pretty self explanatory without labels. Regards, Eric Jiyong Pyon From: Jungkuk Choi
[mailto:jkchoi@methodi.com] All, During internal meeting in nca, I was asked to make a new
illustration of web services quality model. Quality model consists of 3 components – Quality Factor, Quality Associates
and Quality Activity. The definition of Quality Activity which will be
published on next working draft is modified to : various action models performed by Quality
Associates to guarantee the quality of web services. Based
on the definition, I re-drew quality model to reflect the modification and show
the relation between each component. I
attached original ms-project file. What
do you think about it? I want to hear your view on this matter. JK. Technical
Support Group, Junior Consultant Tel +82 2 858 2212 (Ext 300) Mobile +82 2 16 808 9755 Email jkchoi@methodi.com |
QualityModel(20060227_jkchoi).vsd
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]