Public Comment

[comment-form@oasis-open.org]

Comment from: ramyan@us.ibm.com

Name:Ramya Nagarajan
Title:Validation error in ServiceGroup XSD
Organization:IBM
Regarding Specification:http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/wsrf-ws_service_group-1.2-spec-pr-02.pdf

The ServiceGroup XSD (http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/sg-2.xsd) has the following complexType definition:

  <xsd:complexType name="ContentType">
    <xsd:sequence>
      <xsd:element name="RPDoc"
                   type="wsrf-sg:RPDocType"
                   minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" />
      <xsd:any namespace="##any" processContents="lax"
               minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
    </xsd:sequence>
    <xsd:anyAttribute namespace="##other" 
                      processContents="lax"/>
  </xsd:complexType>

This does not validate because of a Unique Particle Attribution error.

One way to fix this would be to redefine ContentType as follows:

  <xsd:complexType name="ContentType">
    <xsd:sequence>
      <xsd:element name="RPDoc"
                   type="wsrf-sg:RPDocType"
                   minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" />
      <xsd:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"
               minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
    </xsd:sequence>
    <xsd:anyAttribute namespace="##other" 
                      processContents="lax"/>
  </xsd:complexType>

I believe that this would maintain the semantics of the ServiceGroup specification.  Any thoughts on this?