[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [no subject]
[Disc06] Discovering to what extend optional management capabilities are supported by a manageability endpoint. E.g. some capabilities might only be accessible in certain states. Or some of the capabilities we define might not be granular enough and people might pick and choose what part of a portType they implement. Or a manageability endpoint might limit what it sends (for example limit based on the size of the reply message, you can't ask for all the resource properties if the resource properties doc is too big). Etc. Can someone smell meta-data? [Disc07] Identifying a "management" WSDL, a "management" EPR. I am having a senior moment here, I can't recall why I put this one in my original list. And why it survived our review in the conf call 2 weeks ago. We already decided that the muws:Identity portType was acting as marker, so I am not sure what else is needed. Can we close this? [Disc08]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]