wsrf message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrf] [Issue WSRF9] summary of alternatives
- From: Steve Graham <sggraham@us.ibm.com>
- To: Dave Snelling <david.snelling@uk.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 07:29:34 -0600
Dave:
I did spend some time thinking about
an approach similiar to your suggestion. What stopped me from including
a write up of this approach in the proposal was:
a) it is non trivial to take an existing
schema document, find the xsd:any and then insert additional elements around
it.
b) if we did an approach such as a),
there is potential confusion for various consumers of the resource property
document. Which of the now many "authoritative sources for the
schema of that document" is in force at any one time? If the
RP is added and then removed, there is a potential for significant problems
when the schema a requestor has in hand is somehow "out of sync"
with the current version reflecting the current set of dynamic resource
properties.
Therefore, I am being conservative here, and chose not to include this
approach.
c) even if we did make the behavior
suggested in a) a SHOULD, it still leaves the requestor unclear over how
to answer the question, especially when dealing with services that chose
to interpret SHOULD as "OK TO IGNORE" (ie not implement).
d) the proposal was getting too big
already, and I was tired of typing :-)
sgg
++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++
| Dave Snelling <david.snelling@uk.fujitsu.com>
06/16/2004 05:11 AM
|
To:
Steve Graham/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc:
WSRF <wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject:
Re: [wsrf] [Issue WSRF9] summary of
alternatives |
Steve,
Let me show some ignorance. You wrote:
> 2a) Use Resource Properties for Resource Property Qnames:
<snip>
> cons: Does not address discovery of "dynamic" resource properties
> declaration in Question iii)
Why can't we specify that any dynamic properties have their schema
added to the wsrp:ResourcePropertyDocumentSchema on the fly? We could
make it a SHOULD if it seems a bit demanding for some implementations.
--
Take care:
Dr. David Snelling < David . Snelling . UK . Fujitsu
. com >
Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe
Hayes Park Central
Hayes End Road
Hayes, Middlesex UB4 8FE
+44-208-606-4649 (Office)
+44-208-606-4539 (Fax)
+44-7768-807526 (Mobile)
This e-mail has been scanned by Trend InterScan Software.
This e-mail (and its attachment(s) if any) is intended for the named
addressee(s) only. It may
contain information which is privileged and confidential within the
meaning of the applicable law.
Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited and may
be unlawful.
If you are not the intended recipient please delete this email and
contact the sender via email return.
Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Ltd (FLE) does not accept responsibility
for changes made to this email after
it was sent. The views expressed in this email may not necessarily be
the views held by FLE.
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this email does not form part of a
legally binding contract
or agreement between the recipient and Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Ltd (FLE).
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]