RE: [wsrf] New issue: Avoid use of "wsrp" for namespace prefix of shorthandfor WS-ResourceProperties

[Ian Robinson <ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com>]

Yes, that was the intent of the suggestion.

Regards,
Ian Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab, UK
ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com

"Latha Srinivasan" <Latha.Srinivasan@hp.com> 24/06/2004 12:59 Please respond to Latha.Srinivasan

To:        "'Steve Graham'" <sggraham@us.ibm.com>, Ian Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB         cc:        <wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org>         Subject:        RE: [wsrf] New issue: Avoid use of "wsrp" for namespace prefix of shorthand for WS-ResourceProperties

+1

---

From: Steve Graham [mailto:sggraham@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 7:53 AM
To: Ian Robinson
Cc: wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsrf] New issue: Avoid use of "wsrp" for namespace prefix of shorthand for WS-ResourceProperties


shall we extend this to wsrf-rl (resource lifetime) wsrf-bf (base faults) and wsrf-sg (service groups)? 

++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++

Ian Robinson <ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com> 06/24/2004 06:54 AM

To:        wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org        cc:                Subject:        [wsrf] New issue: Avoid use of "wsrp" for namespace prefix of shorthand for WS-ResourceProperties

Special request from the Web Service for Remote Portlets TC, who have a prior claim to "WSRP" as an acronym. 

We could consider changing all our namespace prefixes to wsrf-rp, wsrf-rl etc and including "WSRF-RP" etc as the abbreviated form of the specification name in the introductions of each spec to start to train people not to say "WSRP" when they mean "WS-ResourceProperties". 

Regards,
Ian