[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrf] Singleton Resource Pattern - meaning of "implied"
Savas, The rationale for the 'implied' term is in the "Modelling Stateful Resources with Web Service" paper (see http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/download.php/6795/ws-modelingresources.pdf ) "The term implied is used because the stateful resource associated with a given message exchange is treated as implicit execution context for the message request. By implicit, we mean to say that the requestor does not provide the identity of the resource as an explicit parameter in the body of the request message. Instead, the context used to designate the implied stateful resource is encapsulated in the WS-Addressing endpoint reference used to address the target Web service at its endpoint." Regards, Tim Banks IBM TP Architecture & Technology. Hursley, UK. Phone: External +44 1962 815639, Internal 245639 "Savas Parastatidis" <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk> wrote on 12/07/2004 17:00:02: > Hey Steve, > > Please excuse my non-understanding of the terms that you use but I > wonder why “implied” is used. There is nothing implied about the > existence of a resource and the fact that it becomes the logical > recipient of the messages. <snip>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]