[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Proposed resolution for WSRF86 and clarification of WSRF50
Bryan, Could you clarify, in the resolution to issue WSRF50, that the only fault we identified that needs to be moved to the WS-Resource specification the ResourceUnknownFault and that the WS-Resource spec is an affected specification. I uploaded a wsrf-WS-Resource-1.2-draft-03.a.wsdl (http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/download.php/10924/wsrf-WS-Resource-1.2-draft-03.a.wsdl) and wsrf-WS-Resource-1.2-draft-03.a.xsd in support of this issue. The details of the resolution of WSRF86 are then as follows The RP, RL and SG WSDL need to remove any of their own wsdl:message definitions for the ResourceUnknownFault or any import of the definition from WSRF-RP and should instead import the definition (with a wsdl:import) from the new wsrf-WS-Resource-1.2-draft-03.wsdl For consistency, I suggest that the RP, RL and SG WSDL use the same namespace prefix (wsrf-rw) for the WS-Resource WSDL: xmlns:wsrf-rw ="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/2005/02/wsrf-WS-Resource-1.2-draft-03.wsdl" Regards, Ian
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]