[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrf] Issue 87: WSRF-RL -- > WSRF-SG??
Latha, my mistake. Issue WSRF87 was resolved on 10 Jan. Only WSRF-SG is affected - WSRF-RL is not. The resolution was: "The response to the [SG] add [message] should include the actual termination time and optionally the current time." Regards, Ian Robinson STSM, WebSphere Messaging and Transactions Architect IBM Hursley Lab, UK ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com "Srinivasan, Latha" <latha.srinivasan To @hp.com> <wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org> cc 02/02/2005 14:50 Subject [wsrf] Issue 87: WSRF-RL -- > WSRF-SG?? Hi, Issue 87 is on the agenda for discussion at the F2F. The text for Issue 87 seems to indicate that it belongs to WSRF-SG. Is there something that WSRF-RL needs to do to tighten up the semantics of "Add" that is not captured in the Issues List? Issue WSRF87: InitialTerminationTime in Add method needs to have stronger guarantee Version 1.0 of the WS-ServiceGroup specification describes the InitialTerminationTime parameter of the Add method of the ServiceGroupRegistration interface as: "An optional element, indicating the requestor's suggestion for the initial setting of the termination time resource property [WS-ResourceLifetime] of the ServiceGroupEntry WS-Resource." ... Thanks, Latha
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]