Re: [wsrf] Issue 100

[Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>]

SHOULD means that one needs a good reason
for not implementing the guidance. An example of such a good reason is
reusing faults which were defined elsewhere.

Rich Thompson

Samuel Meder <meder@mcs.anl.gov>

05/16/05 11:56 AM

To	wsrf-oasis <wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	[wsrf] Issue 100

I've changed the MUST to a SHOULD, but am wondering if the current  
text isn't still to restrictive. Even with the change to a SHOULD it  
seems to imply that all faults declared in WSDL MUST be a Base Fault.  
Can I assume that the spirit of the resolution was to allow the  
declaration of non-BaseFaults faults in WSDL?

/Sam