[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrf] WSRF comments from Fujitsu
Hiro Kishimoto <hiro.kishimoto@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote on 02/09/2005 04:25:23: > Hi all, > > Fujitsu has done review of WSRF specification series and found > a couple of issues below. > Thanks, > -- > Hiro Kishimoto > > (1) WS-Resource 1.2 PR Draft 01 > Page 11 contains a reference to [WSI Basic Profile 1.1]. But > page 7 defines [WS-Basic Profile 1.1]. We think it is typo. +1 > (2) WS-ResourceProperties 1.2 PR Draft 01 > Page 39 refers to [WS-Topics] but WS-Topics is pre-TC status. > I think it is inappropriate to normatively refer from this > document to pre-TC status specification. The WS-N TC are hoping to produce a public review draft of [WS-Topics] at their WSN F2F in September and so I hope WS-RF will be able to switch its reference to that. We also need to update the WS-BaseNotification references to the PR draft. But, even if WS-Topic is not PR, it is still being advanced through an OASIS TC and has a proper TC status (committee draft). > (3) WS-ResourceProperties 1.2 PR Draft 01 > WS-Topic's URL (wsn-WS-Topics-1.3-cd-01.pdf) on page 44 is > incorrect. Yes; I realise that the WS-BaseNotification URL needs updating too. > > (4) WS-ResourceLifetime 1.2 PR Draft 01 > Page 17 refers to [WS-Topics] but WS-Topics is pre-TC status. > I think it is inappropriate to normatively refer from this > document to pre-TC status specification. Response as above. > (5) WS-ResourceLifetime 1.2 PR Draft 01 > Since page 25 normatively refers to WS-I Basic Profile 1.1, > please add reference [WSI Basic Profile 1.1] to section 8.1. +1 Regards, Ian Robinson STSM, WebSphere Messaging and Transactions Architect IBM Hursley Lab, UK ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]