Re: [wsrf] Public Comment on WS-RM v 1.0 (CA)

[Daniel Jemiolo <danjemiolo@us.ibm.com>]

+1 for this. I suggest that the dialect URI == the RMD namespace 
(http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/rmd-1), which I think Kirk was implying.

Dan



kirk.wilson@ca.com wrote on 08/31/2006 12:56:57 PM:

> With the emergence of both WS-MetadataExchange 1.1 and WS-RM, there will 
be 
> applications that need to integrate these two standards, e.g., by 
including 
> the RMD document in a WS-MEX document.
> 
> One of the requirements of WS-MEX 1.1 is that the each type of metadata 
> document be identified (through a @Dialect attribute) by a URI.  (The 
default 
> seems to be to use the URI of the metadata namespace.)  So that 
applications 
> and integration efforts dont have to guess as to the dialect of the RMD 
> metadata document, CA suggests that there should be an explicit 
statement in 
> the WS-RM spec as to what the URI for the RMD document is for 
WS-MetaDataExchange.
> 
> Kirk Wilson
> CA, Inc.