Re: [wsrm-interop] FW: application level faults

["Alan Weissberger" <ajwdct@technologist.com>]

All

I have asked the same question and never got an answer.

In my opinion, a general weakness of the WS Reliability spec, is it does not cover enough fault cases, where Fault messages should be sent back to sender

alan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Freund"
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:55:55 -0500
To: "WSRM Interop Group (E-mail)"
Subject: [wsrm-interop] FW: application level faults

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark D. Hansen [mailto:khookguy@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:48 PM
> To: WSRM-Implementers (E-mail)
> Subject: application level faults
>
>
> Suppose my RMP-Sender gets an ACK indicating that the message sent has been persisted at the receiving end and is now the responsibility of the RMP-Receiver.
>
> What if the receiver's application now generates a SOAPFault that is not a WSRM fault? How should this fault be propagated back to the sender?
>
> I realize that this is application level communication (not WRSM communication), but is has a lot of pra ctical importance.
>
> How are other implementers handling this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark

Alan Weissberger
2013 Acacia Ct
Santa Clara, CA 95050-3482
1 408 863 6042 voice
1 408 863 6099 fax