[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] question about WSRM XML Schema
This is definitely legal XML, and is very often done for legitimate purposes. Both elements would be considered locally defined. Whether or not this makes sense in our case would be a separate issue - one would need to consider the declaration of both elements, and how they are similar/differ - and the reasons why. Kind Regards, Joe Chiusano Booz | Allen | Hamilton "Mark D. Hansen" wrote: > > Has anyone else noticed that the XML Schema in the draft document has 2 > elements named RM:MessageType? One is a sub-element of the > RM:ReliableMessage header and the other is a sub-element of the > RM:RMResponse header. > > I'm not sure if this is legal XML or not (anybody know?), but it is > definitely confusing. > > I propose that the sub-element of RM:RMResponse be named "ResponseType". > > Mark Hansen > bus: (888) 360-7285 > fax: (914) 723-8671 > email: khookguy@yahoo.com
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]