RE: [wsrm] Version 0.3 of the schema

["Sindambiwe, Eugene" <eugene.sindambiwe@sap.com>]

Sunil, 
I took me some time to look at the modifications. All of them seem correct. Just 
few rather comments: 
1. How do you need both the "RefToSequenceNumberRangeType" and the "SequenceNumberRangeType". I would suggest to use only one type and may be to rename it just "NumberRangeType", or "MessageNumberRangeType"

2. I personally would have preferred to use "AckRequested", "DuplicateElimination", and "MessageOrder" as optional boole-valued attributes rather than empty elements with multiplicity 0-1. But this is just a matter of taste.

3. Using the convention that the absence of any "SequenceNumberStatus" is equivalent to status "continue", the "SequenceNumberStatusType" would even only two values. But since the attribute is optional, the issue is of minor relevance. 
Regards, Eugene
-----Original Message-----
From: Sunil Kunisetty [mailto:Sunil.Kunisetty@oracle.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 4. November 2003 00:54
To: wsrm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrm] Version 0.3 of the schema



 All -

 Attached is v0.3 of the schema based on the "tentative" resolutions.
 See the "Change Log"for details.

 Comments???

 -Sunil