Re: [wsrm] Need to rethink semantics of duplicate elimination behaviour

[Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>]

Tom Rutt wrote:

> Based on our current thinking, we are not sending an ack until the 
> message is actually delivered.
>
> Thus in the ordered delivery held waiting for prior message state, an 
> RMP may receive several
> retransmits of that held, and thus not acknowledged message.
>
> In such a case, the receiving rmp should respond to sending rmp
> regarding its receipt of the duplicate message with an appropirate 
> DuplicateMessage fault. 

say a new fault "duplicate received for message held waiting for prior 
message in sequence"


>
>
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong, but I think we need to clean up the 
> semantics of this from what is in the current draft.
>
> Tom Rutt
>


-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt		email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@fsw.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133