[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Are Relays out of scope?
Furniss, Peter wrote: >Tom, > >Don't waste time on heretics like me :-) > >I don't think a store-and-forward relay is an intermediary in the soap >sense. It's obviously an intermediary in a message queueing sense, but I >would think it was an important (no, vital) element for some use cases. >What if the real sending application and the real receiving application >are never up at the same time ? Or is that ruled out of scope by the >intermediaries discussion. If it is, apologies for wasting your time. > >Peter > > > I think our idea of not dealing explicitly with intermediaries means it is an end to end protocol. I send this to the list to see if anyone disagrees with my assessment of the relay situation. Tom Rutt WSRM chair -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@fsw.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]