[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] Need to rethink semantics of duplicate elimination behaviour
Jacques, I am not sure what you mean. A message may be resent after the receiving application has processed it. The previous acknowledgment could easily have been lost. In effect, the sender is performing the resend in order to retrieve the missing acknowledgment. Of course, that sender does not know or care whether the original message or the acknowledgment was lost. This all means we need acknowledgments for all messages sent reliably whether duplicates or not. thanx, doug On 16-Dec-03 14:31, Jacques Durand wrote: > + 1 on no faults for dups. > > But the end of your mail is ambiguous on one point: > > >I would propose we do not add these dupOfWhatever faults in the first > >place and simply return acknowledgements. > > given the Ack semantics agreed on (ack-on-delivery), > no acks will be sent for dups - which is fine. > > Jacques ...
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]