[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] message headers for Ack and Fault ??
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> wrote at Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:53:11 -0500: > Tony Graham wrote: ... > >The minutes from the January F2F [1] contain this section: > > > > ] 4.20 Rel 94 > > ] > > ] Tom: does it clearly state that the poll can only be done for messages > > ] which were originally send with this pattern set. > > ] > > ] Sunil: it does state this. > > ] > > ] Need to add a section about polling in section 2, with the model. > > ] > > ] Sunil: there is no general section on the model for polling. > > ] > > ] The header elements are properly defined in sections 3.3 and 3.4. > > ] > > ] ACTION: Sunil took action to come up with additions to the model text > > ] for section 2.1 by Friday. > > ] > > ] Left open until modeling text is complete. > > > >Which is true? Is it true that poll can only be done for messages that > >were originally sent with this pattern, or is it true that the Sender > >can send a poll for a message that was specified to use the callback > >pattern? > > > Rel 76 was resolved to state the poll request can be used as a general > purpose status query. > > This happende at the Jan f2f, later in the minutes than what you quoted. Thanks. That explains why I couldn't find anything by searching for '94'. However, I still don't infer that conclusion from reading the current section 2.10, Poll Reply Pattern Semantics and Usage. Regards, Tony Graham ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Web Products, Technologies and Standards Phone: +353 1 8199708 Sun Microsystems x(70)19708 East Point Business Park, Dublin 3, Ireland
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]