Re: [wsrm] [Appendix A] Editorial

[Sunil Kunisetty <Sunil.Kunisetty@oracle.com>]

Tony Graham wrote:

> Sunil Kunisetty <Sunil.Kunisetty@oracle.com> wrote at Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:28:02 -0800:
> > Tony Graham wrote:
> ...
> > > Line 1693
> > >
> > >    The name 'EmptyType' makes me think it is defining something for an
> > >    empty element.  Is there a different name that can be used?
> > >    'CommonType'?  'BaseType'?  'DefaultType'?  'SequenceType'?
> > >
> >
> >  It is indeed used as an EmptyType. For ex., AckRequested won't have
> >  any child elements, in that case, AckRequested element extends
> >  this EmptyType.
>
> Yes, but it's also used for RefToMessageIdsType, and RefToMessageIds
> does have child elements.  It is also used in Tom's recent sample

 This is because the Node RefToMessageIdsType doesn't have any value to itself.
 So basically it is used when a Node doesn't have any value..

 Also, this is not a exposed element (just an internal element name), so it shouldn't
 be that big a deal what we call it.

>
> schemas for elements that have child elements, which is actually what
> got me noticing the name.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony Graham
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Web Products, Technologies and Standards           Phone: +353 1 8199708
> Sun Microsystems                                              x(70)19708
> East Point Business Park, Dublin 3, Ireland