Re: [wsrm] Detailed proposal to allow Batching of Acks and RM faultsusing Response Reply pattern.

[Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>]

Tom Rutt wrote:

> Lines 1019 thru 1024 currently state the following:
>
> “
> - *Response *: An Acknowledgment message (or Fault message) MUST be 
> sent back
> directly in the response to the Reliable Message. This pattern is not
> applicable for one-way application level MEP. The acknowledgment
> message that can be sent back in the response is for the message in the
> request only. Acknowledgment message for the former request
> MUST NOT be sent back.
> “
>
> To allow the receiving RMP to return acks or falts for former 
> requests, the last two sentences are too strong:

Discussions have led to a concensus that the spec should be silent on 
sending extra information in the response for the response reply pattern.

The proposal to resolve rel 108 and rel 115 includes restrictions on a 
response element pertaining to  response reply pattern.  These are
the more approprate way to state the requirment, without disallowing 
extensions to provide more information.

Delete  the last two sentences:
"
The acknowledgment message that can be sent back in the response is for 
the message in the
request only. Acknowledgment message for the former request MUST NOT be 
sent back.
"

>

-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt		email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@fsw.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133