Re: [wsrm] Re: [editorial] change of element names

[Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>]

Sunil Kunisetty wrote:

> While at this, I also propose to rename the fault attribute for both ReplyRange
> and NonSequenceReply to faultCode.
>  
>
This is overly verbose in my opinion.  I see not need for this change.
Tom Rutt

> -Sunil
>
>Sunil Kunisetty wrote:
>
>  
>
>> I propose that all our Header element names start with the
>> prefix 'RM', i.e., Request element be renamed RMRequest,
>> PollRequest be renamed as RMPollRequest, and Response
>> be renamed RMResponse.
>>
>> Reason being that the current names are too generic and
>> could be confusing (to manual readers). Not an issue for
>> tools though as they are all QNames.
>>
>> Just to jot some memories, all our names indeed used to start
>> with this prefix a while back.
>>
>> However, they were removed later as people felt it is redundant
>> as the namespace prefix (used in some of our examples) also
>> use the word 'rm'.
>>
>> To me that's a flawed reasoning.
>>
>> Namespace prefix is just a namespace prefix. We can't mandate
>> that consumers of this always use the prefix 'rm'.  Namespace
>> prefix is just a convenience alias mechanism.
>>
>> It's valid and legal to use any prefix (foo:Request, xyz:InvalidMessageId
>> etc..) as long as the prefix is correctly defined to our namespace.
>>
>> Infact, the usage of prefix is not always required if the default namespace
>> is defined to be RM namespace. As a matter of fact, the examples in
>> page 7-8-9 doesn't use any prefix for RM elements.
>>
>> -Sunil
>>    
>>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>  
>

-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt		email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@fsw.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133