RE: [wsrm] Rel49 Features & Properties proposal.

[<chris.hipson@bt.com>]

Rel49 Features & Properties proposal.

As I see it there are 3 questions here.

1) Do we use Features & Properties or something else?

2) Should it's use be limited to WSDL1.1 RM spec with a statement that
we will migrate to whatever the industry standard becomes?

3) Should we use the Oracle namespace of an RM one?


Anish / Tom - are there any issues with us 'borrowing' something from
WSDL 2.0?


========================================================================
====

Tom:  Can we have a straw pole / resolve this by e-mail?

My vote:
1) Do we use Features & Properties?

Yes it's marginally better to have something concrete that may go the
distance.

2) Should its use be limited to WSDL1.1 RM spec with a statement that we
will migrate to whatever the industry standard becomes?

Yes, nor do I think we have to highlight WSDL2.0 as a choice, the use of
F&P will speak for itself anyway.

3) Should we use the Oracle namespace of an RM one?

To restrict this to being within WSRM I think we should use an RM
namespace.

Cheers Chris Hipson BTplc


-----Original Message-----
From: iwasa [mailto:kiwasa@jp.fujitsu.com] 
Sent: 03 March 2004 04:41
To: wsrm; Anish Karmarkar
Subject: [wsrm] Rel49

Anish and all,

Since we have short time remaining before
WS-I F2F meeting, we must close Rel49 by the telecon 
next week with concrete proposal with text to be 
incorporated in the spec.

*And* if we can not agree the resolution by that time,
I would propose we do not include anything
in the spec for Rel49 and close the issue with no action.

I do not agree to spend additional one more week when
we can't close the issue by the next telecon.

So I would propose Anish to send out proposal
ASAP (by the end of this week at latest, I would suggest) 
to discuss and agree with the proposal before the telecon, 
if you really need your proposal accepted. Otherwise there
would be chance of running out of time.

I hope we resolve issue49 before the next telecon.

Thanks,

Iwasa

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgrou
p.php.