Subject: Comments on WS-R by Chris Ferris in his presentation accepted by the TC as public comment
Pubic review comments from Chris Ferris:
Cf1: Two schemas and namespaces are unnecessary for two soap versions.
Cf2: Why are soap faults not used for RM-Fault?
Cf3: Not Acking until delivery to the application causes unnecessary delays?
Cf4: Unclear if the spec can compose with WS-Addressing or WS-MD?
Cf5: Persistence model will not work on devices with non volatile storage?
Cf6: Mandatory Expiry time requires synchronization of clocks:
Cf7: There is unnecessary complexity in the spec, headers have unnecessary elements
making them larger than necessary?
Cf8: The spec does not state that every delivered message MUST be acknowledged.