[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] Strawman Proposal for New wording of Section 5.2
Tom, I do not have an opportunity prior to Tuesday's meeting to propose an alternative. That is not good because I get very confused midway through this email as to how you are proposing to resolve the various issues I have described. We may do better to talk about the features WS-Reliability provides in direct terms rather than mapping that language to WSDL. That is, we can talk about which RM-Reply patterns support or disallow consumer payloads, when those payloads are returned (carried over the wire). Your text seems to move further toward tying the WS-Reliability protocol's use of the underlying transport to the producer / consumer interface choices. This seems to be heading in the wrong direction. thanx, doug On 18-Jun-04 12:24, Tom Rutt wrote: ...
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]