[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: comments on Jacques Update on mep mappings
Overall I think Jacques has produced the text we need to go forward. I have some detailed comments, which are relatively minor (but important I think) on his proposal: Tom RUtt Summary of Comments on COntribution-JD-WS-Reliability-2004-06-21.Pdf From Tom Rutt Page: 3 line 82 : Response should be Respond Page: 6 Sequence number: 1 line 164: why must a receiving rmp which does not support response reply pattern have to implement the Respond primitive? Sequence number: 2 line 179: I do not understand what "thus marking the end of the reliability contract for this message" adds to the specifiction of the Deliver operation, especially if the request is part of a wsdl request response operation using the response reply pattern. Page: 9 Sequence number: 1 Line 273: wether -> whether Sequence number: 2 Line 279: add ," and a response payload (p2) to transfer in reverse," after "RMP2". Page: 10 Sequence number: 1 line 301: the words "when explicitly mandated, like in the WS-I Basic Profile" should be restated as "when explicitly specified, for example the WS-I conformant SOAP/HTTP-POST binding ? Sequence number: 2 Line 318: the underlying response may not always be for communicating errors. It could be a success HTTP response, with no soap envelope. Should be "and correlated with the underlying protocol request". Page: 12 Sequence number: 1 Line 364: must -> MUST Sequence number: 2 LIne 375: must -> MUST Page: 16 lines 494-499: this note is obscure: All we need is the first sentence. Page: 17 Lines 528 thru 531: Again this paragraph is obscure, Only the first sentence is needed. Page: 18 Lines 546 - 549: again this paragraph is obscure. Only the first sentence is needed. Page: 45 Line 1354: there could be a note explaining that a wsdl spec that includes the wsrm response element as an output part bound to the soap header is a request/response wsdl operation type. Page: 47 lines 1410-1411: I do not understand why these two incomplete sentences need to be added. WSRM fault codes are defined elsewhere. -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]