[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] Groups - COntribution-JD-WS-Reliability-2004-06-21.pdfuploaded
This behaviour of sending soap fault with rm fault when no response payload is available due to rm fault, has been in the spec for a long time. I would say a member would have to come up with a real problem with this behaviour to raise a new technical issue at this time. Please justtify this issue, so far I have not seen a justification to change that is convincing. Tom Rutt Also what is the alternative to send when the wsdl contract is not obeyed (there is no response to put in soap body)? du Sunil Kunisetty wrote: >> >> >>> 4) Section 4.5 still talks about sending both SOAP and RM Fault, >>> which is wrong and needs to be corrected >>> (I do understand that your exercise is not intended to fix this but >>> even the latest 1.03 draft has the same >>> problem). >> >> >> >> This has been agreed for a long time. This was agreed a long time >> ago. The text in 4.5 is now considered stable. >> >> The rm fault, which results in no response payload being avilable >> return for a response reply pattern, MUST be >> returned with a soap fault (the lack of response does not obey the >> wsdl contract for that operation). >> >> If someone wants to question this, they must raise an issue, knowing >> that we already voted on making it the way it is. > > > I do. I want to be raised as an issue. > > I have sent many mails on this topic explaining why this is wrong and > undesired and even > briefly discussed this with Jacques. > > Also, this one is listed as Issue/Item 4(a) in Doug's summary mail at: > http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00123.html > > So I assumed it was raised as an issue/item to be discussed.. > > The mails I've sent on this thread: > http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00085.html > http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00108.html > http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00110.html > http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00115.html > http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00117.html > >> >>> >>> -Sunil >>> >>> jdurand@us.fujitsu.com wrote: >>> >>>> The document COntribution-JD-WS-Reliability-2004-06-21.pdf has been >>>> submitted by Jacques Durand (jdurand@us.fujitsu.com) to the OASIS >>>> Web Services Reliable Messaging TC document repository. >>>> >>>> Document Description: >>>> latest proposal in extending the WS-R message model, by adding >>>> Respond operation, and removing limitation to "request-response" >>>> underlying protocol. >>>> >>>> Download Document: >>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/7454/COntribution-JD-WS-Reliability-2004-06-21.pdf >>>> >>>> >>>> View Document Details: >>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/document.php?document_id=7454 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email >>>> application >>>> may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy >>>> and paste >>>> the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the >>>> roster of the OASIS TC), go to >>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the >>> roster of the OASIS TC), go to >>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster > of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]