OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: on the need for a reopening an issue on soap fault with rm faultwhen no payload

Sunil has, in his emails on the subject
The mails I've sent on this thread:

made the point that the sending rmp can intercept the rm fault and 
deliver the fault to the producer, without a soap fault.

I think this is a valid implementation, but if the soap fault is 
signalled to the sending rmp it still extracts the wsrm:response from
the header and can do the same thing it would do if the soap body is empty.

I am sorry, I have read these mails three times, and I still do not 
understand the problem with the behaviour
we have in the spec regarding sending the rmfault in a soap
header with a soap fault when there is no payload to put in the soap body.

Tom Rutt

Tom Rutt	email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]