We need updated letters

[Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>]

The chair needs updated statements from  TC member organizations
 on thier experience with the spec.

I include pointers to the e-mail archive record of the previous statements made.

I think it is important that these letters
should be updated to explicitly refer to CD 1.086 of ws-Reliability specification.


 

Hitachi:

http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00050.html

 

Fujitsu

http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00084.html

 

Oracle:

http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00081.html 



NEC:


http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200406/msg00121.html 


from the tc process
"
Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations that they
are successfully using the specification. (Despite numerous requests,
the OASIS TC Administrator feels it is not in the TC's best interests
to further define the meaning of "successfully using". The
implementation could really be anything from prototypes or proof of
concept all the way up to shrink-wrapped software. Defining this
further would only restrict the definition and make it harder for
member organizations to say that they are successfully using the
specification.) This certification can be in the form of a simple
statement in email from a company representative, e.g. "I certify that
XYZ company is successfully using...." The implementers must also
certify that their implementations comply with known IP encumbrances
(see IPR below). The submission should include the URLs of these mail
messages in the TC's email archive. 
"


-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt	email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133