[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] Second Draft Submission Letter for WS-Reliability
Ooops the previous file had the wrong date on it The new file with the correct date is shown here: 5. An account of each of the comments/issues raised during the public review period, along with its resolution. http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/9025/PublicCommentsIsssues-090204.html <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/7725/PublicCommentsIsssues-070604OutputB.html> Tom Rutt wrote: > I just updated the pubic comments issue resolutions to include Doug's > change of replyPattern on response, along > with the reordering of the rm-replies. > > Thus I want to change the answer to question 5 to: > > 5. An account of each of the comments/issues raised during the public > review period, along with its resolution. > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/9023/PublicCommentsIsssues-090204.html > > > > Tom Rutt wrote: > >> Here is a second draft, which updates the references to the >> experience letters, and changes the summary >> as suggested by Alan W. (I eliminated the first sentence of the last >> para of Alan's suggestion because it repeats what is in the next >> question. >> >> If There are no comments on this second draft, I will send it to Karl >> Best Tomorrow morning. >> >> Tom Rutt >> WSRM TC Chair >> ------------------ >> Draft Submission Letter for WS-Reliability 1.1 >> >> >> 1. A formal specification that is a valid member of its type, together >> with appropriate documentation for the specification, both of which >> must be written using approved OASIS templates. >> >> Zip file at: >> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/8936/WS-Reliability-CD1.086.zip >> containing the following five files: >> WS-Reliability-CD1.086.pdf WS-Reliability version 1.1, CD 1.086 >> ws-reliability-1.1.xsd Ws-Reliability schema >> reference-1.1.xsd Reference type schema >> fnp-1.1.xsd Features and Properties schema >> wsrmfp-1.1.xsd wsrm features and properties schema >> >> >> 2. A clear English-language summary of the specification. >> >> The WS-Reliabilty specification, version 1.1, specifies a transport- >> independent, SOAP based protocol for the reliable delivery of messages. >> Reliable message delivery may be critical to some applications using >> Web Services. >> >> SOAP over HTTP [RFC2616] is not sufficient when an application-level >> messaging protocol must also guarantee some level of reliability and >> security. This specification defines reliability in the context of >> current Web Services standards. >> >> The WS Reliability specification provides the following reliability >> features: >> >> - Guaranteed message delivery, or At-Least-Once delivery semantics. >> - Guaranteed message duplicate elimination, or "At-Most-Once" delivery >> semantics. >> - Guaranteed message delivery and duplicate elimination, or "Exactly- >> Once" delivery semantics. >> - Guaranteed message ordering for delivery within a group of >> (sequential) messages. >> >> The WS-Reliabilty specification uses SOAP 1.1 or 1.2 Part 1. It may be >> used with other transport protocols/bindings besides HTTP. >> >> 3. A statement regarding the relationship of this specification to >> similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing >> organizations. >> >> This specification has been designed to be used in combination with >> other complementary protocols, and has built upon previous experiences >> from the ebXML Message Service [ebMS].) Both WS-Reliability and ebMS >> have same messaging reliability contracts as objectives: guaranteed >> delivery, no duplicate delivery, ordered delivery, and combinations of >> these. >> >> However, WS-Reliability has improved on scalability and performance by >> generalizing the use of sequence numbers, and can accommodate different >> security and access conditions on each party, as this is more >> frequently the case with a Web service and its clients, compared to >> more symmetrical access conditions in messaging. The reliability >> contract is more "application-oriented" in WS-R, where acknowledgment >> is on final delivery, in contrast to "on receipt" by the message >> handler in ebMS. >> >> 4. Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations that they >> are successfully using the specification consistently with the OASIS >> IPR Policy. >> >> The chair has received statements from the following TC member >> organizations. We include pointers to the e-mail archive record of >> the statements made. >> >> Hitachi: >> http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200409/msg00000.html >> >> Fujitsu >> http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200408/msg00130.html >> >> Oracle: >> http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200408/msg00125.html >> >> NEC: >> http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200408/msg00127.html >> >> 5. An account of each of the comments/issues raised during the public >> review period, along with its resolution. >> >> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/7725/PublicCommentsIsssues-070604OutputB.html >> >> >> 6. An account of and results of the voting to approve the >> specification as a Committee Draft. >> >> TC roll call vote at teleconf on August 24, 2004 >> >> Name Company Vote for CD 1.086 >> --------------- ------------------- ------------------ >> Joseph Chiusano Booz Allen Hamilton y >> Jeff Turpin Cyclone Commerce y >> Jacques Durand Fujitsu y >> Kazunori Iwasa Fujitsu Not present >> Tom Rutt Fujitsu y >> Jishnu Mukerji Hewlett-Packard Not present >> Robert Freund Hitachi y >> Eisaku Nishiyama Hitachi y >> Nobuyuki Yamamoto Hitachi Not present >> Junichi Tatemura NEC Corporation y >> Alan Weissberger NEC Corporation y >> Abbie Barbir Nortel Networks y >> Mark Peel Novell y >> Sunil Kunisetty Oracle y >> Jeff Mischkinsky Oracle Not present >> Pete Wenzel SeeBeyond y >> Doug Bunting Sun Microsystems y >> Tony Graham Sun Microsystems y >> Chi-Yuen Ng Univ of Hong Kong y >> >> 15 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain, 4 not present >> >> 78% of eligible voting members voted yes >> 0% of eligible voting members voted no >> 0% of eligible voting members abstained >> >> 7. An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in any >> earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same specification, >> together with the originating TC's response to each comment. >> >> This specification has not been previously submitted to OASIS. >> >> >> 8. A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the >> originating TC >> >> WSRM TC public comment list: >> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm-comment/ >> >> WSRM TC list: >> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/ >> >> >> 9. A statement from the chair of the TC certifying that all members of >> the TC have been provided with a copy of the OASIS IPR Policy. >> >> The TC chair certifies that all members have been reminded to read the >> IPR statement on numerous occasions and also in an e-mail >> “Call for IPR disclosure regarding ws-Reliability spec” at: >> http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200405/msg00022.html >> >> >> 10. Optionally, a pointer to any minority reports submitted by one or >> more TC members who did not vote in favor of approving the Committee >> Draft, or certification by the chair that no minority reports exist. >> >> No minority reports have been submitted to the chair as of this >> writing. >> >> >> Submitted by the TC chair, Tom Rutt, trutt@us.fujitsu.com >> >> >> ------------------ >> > -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]