SAP comment with No Vote for WS-Reliability

[Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>]

the text for the SAP no vote is attached.

We need to discuss this no vote on Wed AM at the f2f meeting in Sunnyvale.

I propose that we prepare an explanation to SAP on why we have specified 
the features and capabilities mechanism
as an optional conformance point, just as we did for their NO vote on CD 
ballot .992.

I recomend that members vote yes at the F2f (the vote will be during the 
teleconference portion of the meeting)
 to make the ws-reliability an OASIS standard, even with the SAP No vote.

Tom Rutt
WSRM TC Chair

-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt	email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133

--- Begin Message ---

• From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org>
• To: Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org>
• Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 14:56:27 -0500

Paul:

I'm trying to figure out the permissions on the attachment. In the 
meantime (since I can see it :-) I've attached it to this reply.

-Karl



Paul Denning wrote:
> [1] 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/voting/vote_details.php?id=578&voter_id=542
> 
> I was denied access to [1].  I am an Observer.  Please explain whether 
> an Observer should have access, or policy for who can access it.
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> 
> 

WS-Reliability.doc

--- End Message ---