[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrm] Correction and addition to minutes of 1/25 call
I will make the changes before posting the minutes to the server Tom Rutt Alan Weissberger wrote: > Tom > > I would appreciate if you would insert my response to Doug's issue in > the minutes. Only part of what I said was recorded in your prelim > minutes. Also, I am adding something you said about "priorities" to > your comment. > > I am using *bold font* to distinguish the additional remarks/comments. > > Doug B: We are talking about an implementation guide, but now we are > talking about delving deeply into that part. We had discussed in the > past the need for general implementation guidelines. Here we are > talking about specific guidelines about ws security and ws > –reliability aspects. > > We need to also work on the general implementation guidlelines, using > feedback from interop SC. > > Alan: *I fully support the Implementation Guide. In fact, I had > earlier posted an outline for it. I am suggesting that the work plan > for the Composition of WS-R and WS-Security (as we have proposed > today) should proceed in parallel with the work on the Implementation > Guide. However, I believe that the TC has agreed that the Composition > work effort has higher priority than the Guide.* > > Tom: *We also have to pursue and progress the Implementation Guide > document. The issue of prioritization will be determined by the > contributions we get from the group for each of the documents. We > don't have to decide the priorities right now.* > > Alan: *OK, but **I think that we need consensus from the group on > what models, assumptions, and requirements are needed for > the composability of WS-R and WS-Security (Part I Composability > Concepts document). That is a high priority, in my opinion.* > > Tom: Doug B: I was just concerned about the earlier discussion on the > need for multiple methods of composition. > > Jacques: Some of the work we are doing might go into an implementation > guidelines document. I would like an abstract processing model with > multiple soap headers. Going beyond this might also be put into a > specific implementation guidelines. > > Tom: there is an existing call to have members look at the translated > document and add scenarious they would like to see in the guide. > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster > of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php. -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]