[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Prelim Minutes of TC meeint 5/31
Prelim minutes are attached. Please post corrections to the list before the end of this week. Tom Rutt WSRM TC Chair -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133Title: Draft Agenda to WSRM TC Conference Call – May 06, 2003
Prelim Minutes for WSRM TC Conference
Call – The meeting of the WSRM TC took place by teleconference 1
Draft
Agenda:
1 Draft Agenda to WSRM TC Conference Call 2 Roll Call 3 Minutes Discussion 3.1 Appointment of Minute Taker 3.2 Approval of previous meeting minutes – 4 Action Item Status Review 5 Status of WS-Reliability Specification 6 Composability with other WS-Specs 7 WS-RX Gap Analysis 8 New business 2
Roll
Call
Attendance:
Meeting is quorate. 3
Minutes
Discussion
Alan Volunteer to take minutes after 6, tom before 6.. 3.1 Approval of previous meeting minutesThe minutes of the 5/17 Teleconference meeting are posted at: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/12813/MinutesWSRMTC51705.htm Alan Moved to approve the 5/17 minutes, Jacques seconded. No opposition minutes 5/17 minutes are approved 4 Status of Action Items4.1 Action 121404-2 (Anish) OpenAction: Oracle will provide examples of soap header dumps with both ws-reliability and ws-Security headers in use, as in the interop demo. Anish posted email: WSS and WS-Reliability header dumps Anish Karmarkar 24 Feb 2005 23:22:27 Anish may post some additional examples of other combinations. Leave open 4.1 Action 012505-1 (Tom Rutt) PendingAction: Tom will investigate how to change the status of printed document. The posted standard still states CD. Continuing action, sent newest version to OASIS Staff with Errata to post before last meeting. Still waiting for OASIS staff to post. 4.2 Action 042805-1 (Jacques Durand) PendingAction: Jacques will post a new version of the composability analysis, to reflect discussions at the F2F meeting. Leave Open. 5 Status of WS-Reliability SpecificationThe public and member web site pages for the TC to have a single announcement, which refers by URL to spec and schema at the proper location on the OASIS web site. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrm/2004/06/WS-Reliability-CD1.086.pdf http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrm/2004/06/fnp-1.1.xsd http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrm/2004/06/reference-1.1.xsd http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrm/2004/06/ws-reliability-1.1.xsd http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrm/2004/06/wsrmfp-1.1.xsd The spec at the above link itself still shows status a CD. Tom posted a version with edited cover page with proper ID and status at: We still await OASIS Staff to post it at the appropriate location. An errata document was voted as CD at the F2F meeting and was posted at: This is also still waiting to be posted at the proper location by the OASIS Staff. 6 Composability with other WS-SpecsWS-Security
Composition paper from Fujitsu, WS-Reliabilty And WS-Security - First Draft The latest version of composability aspects is posted as: Jacques has an action item to post a version reflecting the f2f discussion. Paul Knight stated Abbie might be interested in a contribution on composition with security. 7 WS-RX Gap AnalysisThe WS-Reliability Requirements are posted at: The output of a task force effort
was posted by Jacques at: Discussion was opened on this document. At the last meeting we agreed that the TC would have a task force to work on the gap analysis, and that the output of the task force will be contributed by individual members to the WS-RX TC. Jacques reviewed the current document. Rather than using the requirements as a basis, the task force decided it would be better to compare the features directly between the two specs. These differences in features lead to discussion of Use cases illustrating the differences. Jacques stated that the requirements are not detailed enough to raise the discussion to the level of comparing features. Tom: I am not sure we need to have a separate document based on the ws-reliability requirements. Alan: I would like to add that the use cases in this document are not reflected in the requirements, but which could have been put into the implementers guide. Tom asked what the TC should do with this document. Jacques stated that feedback on this document is welcome from TC members. I would like to have some editorial closure before making it widely available. Tom: members should provide comments on the list, and we can discuss the document at the next meeting, and decide at that meeting if we need to give the document any status. Tom: discussion on this document should be on the entire list. Alan I hope we get comments from members on style, format and content. 8
New Business
Jacques brought up the question of interop for composability. Open call is still out, but nobody has answered. Oracle stated the are not interested. Chair moved to adjourn, Paul Knight seconded. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]