[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Full agenda for Tuesday Nov 29 TC meeting
The full agenda with links is attached for Today's OASIS WSRM TC teleconf. -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133Title: Full Agenda for WSRM TC Conference Call –June 14, 2005
Full Agenda WSRM TC Conference Call –Nov
29, 2005 The meeting of the WSRM TC will take place by teleconference Time Tuesday, 29 November 2005, 05:30pm to 06:30pm ET Description Host: Fujitsu Toll only : 1-512-225-3050 Participant code: 375491
|
120229 |
James Bryce Clark |
03 Nov 2005 18:30:05 |
Recently another OASIS committee, the WS-RX TC, suggested that they
use the
partial namespace:
[docs.oasis-open.org/wsrm/...]
for final
versions of documents. The WS-RX TC is
producing work
tentatively
entitled "WS Reliable Messaging", to which the character string
"wsrm"
was intended to point.
I informed them that the foregoing namespace was reserved for your TC,
and that
in our document handling at OASIS, the first token space
immediately
after the domain generally is populated from a controlled
vocabulary
of the official TC short names. So, for
example, your OASIS
standard
is located at:
[docs.oasis-open.org/wsrm/ws-reliability/v1.1/...]
'
where
"wsrm" is your TC name token, and "ws-reliability" is the
product
(spec)
name token.
Some members of the WS-RX TC indicated a desire to use the following
possible
alternative approach:
[docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/....]
where
"wsrm" would indicate a product name, not a TC. As you may recall,
at this
time, documents are uploaded to the [docs.oasis-open.org] space
only by
OASIS staff action. So staff approval
of the correct URI is a
practical
precondition to any upload. I informed
the WS-RX TC that, if we
received
requests from them to upload to a URI of that kind, OASIS staff
would
inquire whether your TC (as user of the "wsrm" token) had any
objection
to it being used in a different context.
Objections from your TC would not necessarily be determinative, but
would be a
factor about which we'd want be aware, before acting. I see
that you
discussed but did not adopt a TC position on this issue at your
recent TC
meeting. We would appreciate being
advised of the views of such
TC members as
wish to express an opinion, formally or informally.
Thanks and regards
JBC
~
James Bryce Clark
~
Director, Standards Development, OASIS
~
jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
The working list of potential enhancements to WS-Reliability was posted after the last f2f as:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/12436/wsReliabityFutureFeatures.htm
On 9/19/2003, a paper was posted to the wsrm mailing list, edited by Jacques
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/email/archives/200309/msg00053.html
After review, the TC mail list can be used to comment in this paper, as to its continued relevance to TC future activities.
Jamie Clark told Tom Rutt that there is no “mothball” status for TCs, however a TC can have two meetings a year, if it wishes to stay active in a limited capacity (such as resolution of defect reports).
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]