Prelim Minutes of 10/31 tc meeting

[Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>]

Prelim minutes of 10/31 TC meeting attached.

Please provide corrections before next monday.

Tom Rutt

Title: Full Agenda for WSRM TC Conference Call –June 14, 2005

Prelim Minutes WSRM TC Conference Call – Oct 31 2006

 

5:30 – 6:30 PM EDT.

 

Textual Conventions

 

Ø  Action Item

Motion

§    Resolution

1          Draft Agenda:

Agenda           

 

WSRM TC Teleconference

US toll free: 800.483.2503

intl: 617.614.3824

participant code: 27175925

Agenda Agenda

1.      review agenda

2.      Roll Call

3.      Minutes approval

4.      Action Items

5.      Discussion of WS-Reliability Candidate CD 1.1.1 Kavi Vote

6.      Progression Plan for WS-Reliability v 1.1.1

7.      New Business

 

Add on new business April 15 deadline from OASIS on the new IPR.

2          Roll Call

Attendance: 

Last Name	First Name	Role	Company	Vote for transition request to rf on limited terms
Durand	Jacques	Secretary	Fujitsu Limited*	y
Iwasa	Kazunori	Voting Member	Fujitsu Limited*
Rutt	Tom	Chair	Fujitsu Limited*	y
Freund	Robert	Voting Member	Hitachi, Ltd.*	y
Nishiyama	Nobuyuki	Member	Hitachi, Ltd.*
Yamamoto	Paul	Voting Member	Hitachi, Ltd.*
Knight	Anish	Voting Member	Nortel Networks Limited*	y
Karmarkar	Pete	Voting Member	Oracle Corporation*	y
mischkinsky	Daniel	Member	Oracle Corporation*
Wenzel	fred	Voting Member	Sun Microsystems*	y

 

 

Meeting is quorate

 

3          Minutes Discussion

 

Tom Rutt volunteered to take minutes.

 

3.1       Approval of previous meeting minutes

 

The minutes of the Oct 03 teleconference meeting are posted at: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/20813/MinutesWsrmTC-100306.htm

 

Bob  moved to approve the oct 3 minutes, Jacques  seconded.

 

No opposition Oct 3 minutes are approved

 

4          Status of Action Items

None

 

 

5          Discussion of Candidate Committee Draft Kavi Vote for WS-Reliability 1.1.1

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/ballot.php?id=1123  

 

5.1       Voting Summary

Options with highest number of votes are bold

Option	# Votes	% of Total
Yes	2	100%
No	0	0%

 

Eligible members who have voted:	2 of 8	25%
Eligible members who have abstained:	0 of 8	0%
Eligible members who have not voted:	6 of 8	75%

 

We did not get over 50 percent of voting members.

 

Not enough yes votes.

5.2       Interpretations of ballot

There were not enough members to approve the cd.

 

Some concerns which were expressed privately to the chair included:

 

• No change to protocol, thus no need for new spec version
• Concerns about impact on perception of stability for ws-reliability

 

 

 

6          Progression Plan for WS-Reliability v 1.1.1

Tom: I propose we progress this as application notes on how to use ws-reliability to do reliable request response.  This feature does not require modification of protocol.

 

Jacques: the only feature that may need to be profiled is the caching of response, which is just an option in the current spec.  The application note would say “if you want reliability of response, the implementation must support caching of response.”

 

Jacques agreed to produce a draft application notes as editor.

 

Paul Knight: I could support CD on application notes to say how to use protocol for two way.

 

No opposition. Jacques to produce application notes for review of committee.

 

7          New Business

Dec 12 agreed for next meeting.

Get feedback on draft before that meeting.

Put on agenda the April 15 2007 deadline discussion

Two branches:

Branch 1 – work towards dissolving tc.

Branch 2 – work towards Transitioning to the new IPR mode.

Jeff: the choice it to vote to go to new IPR policy, pick the mode, or disband the TC.

Bob: The question is that the TC has not made progress on requirements for new features.  The spec has been stabilized. While I would agree to transition to new policy for maintenance.

Bob F: I Suggest we move to new IPR policy.

 

Jeff: we would prefer RF on limited terms.  To do this someone needs to make a motion, and then we need 30 day ballot.

Bob: I move to ask TC to agree to a transition request to IPR policy of RF on limited Terms,  seconded by Paul K.

Majority yes to go forward with the ballot.

Transition approval ballot will start 30 days after the request.

Action: Tom will submit transition request to TC administrator.

Jeff: to clarify, if you look at the charter of this group, it is as close as we could get to RF.  When we wrote the charter we would have agreed to rf on limited terms.

Bob f moved to adjourn, Paul seconded

No opposition meeting adjourned.