[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Prelim minutes of WSRM TC Teleconf 1/23/2007
Prelim minutes are attached. Please provide any corrections on minutes before next monday. Please provide comments on application notes by Friday Feb 3. Tom Rutt -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133Title: Full Agenda for WSRM TC Conference Call –June 14, 2005
Preliminary Minutes WSRM TC Conference Call – Jan 23, 2007 5:30 – 6:30 PM EDT.
Textual Conventions Ø Action Item Motion § Resolution 1
Draft Agenda:
|
Last Name |
Role |
Company |
Durand |
Secretary |
Fujitsu Limited* |
Iwasa |
Voting Member |
Fujitsu Limited* |
Rutt |
Chair |
Fujitsu Limited* |
Freund |
Voting Member |
Hitachi, Ltd.* |
Nishiyama |
Member |
Hitachi, Ltd.* |
Yamamoto |
Voting Member |
Hitachi, Ltd.* |
Knight |
Voting Member |
Nortel Networks Limited* |
Karmarkar |
Voting Member |
Oracle Corporation* |
Wenzel |
Voting Member |
Sun Microsystems |
Meeting is quorate
The minutes of the Oct 31 teleconference meeting are posted at: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/21227/MinutesWsrmTC-103106b.htm
Jacques moved to
approve the oct 31
minutes, Bob seconded.
No opposition Oct 31 minutes are approved
Action: Jacques to produce application notes for review of committee
Done
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/voting/ballot.php?id=1194
Royalty free on lmited terms.
|
Paul Knight had no comments on their vote on the ballot. He cannot state at this time what IPR mode transition would get a yes vote from Nortel.
Without the member present there is no need to immediately discuss a new IPR transition.
Bob F: what is the difference with getting the apnote done and finishing before April. What is benefit to refresh the group beyond April.
Tom: Maintenance of the spec was one thing talked about in the past.
Bob F: It has been more than a year, chances are we will not see to many maintenance requests.
Tom: I have heard about a maintenance mode TC .
Jacques: the TAB is considering a recommendation on Maintenance Mode TCs. But is has not been progressed to date.
Pete: I am not sure it would exist in time for the April transition.
Bob F: that maintenance mode TC would require a charter.
Pete: you would close the old TC charter as work completed, and start a new TC for only errata to be produced.
Bob F: If it existed in the future, we could do that when we have maintenance to do.
Jacques: If there is not much work we can reduce the frequency of calls down to every two or three months. The feed back from implementers may take time. Although it is unlikely that there will be more feedback, I would like to check with people in my company.
Bob F: OASIS requires one every 6 months as minimum frequency.
Bob F: we would have to do the ipr transition to keep that group going.
Bob F: what happens if a defect on an existing oasis spec is sent in. We could set up a maintenance tc then. The spec is now two years old.
Jacques: If we cannot transition to new IPR mode, we could get a limited charter not authorizing new release of spec, but only errata, in which case RF mode does not matter much.
Tom: we should discuss this further at next meeting.
Tom: I will add “What to do about April IPR Transition Deadline” on agenda for next meeting.
Draft Application Notes From Jacques posted as: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/download.php/21921/wsrm-AppNotes-draft.doc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]