RE: [wsrp-wsia] Re: [wsrp-interfaces] RE: [wsia] Sessions

[Eilon Reshef <eilon.reshef@webcollage.com>]

Title: Message

Mike,

 

If I understand your question correctly, I think you have addressed this in your latest interface write-up. As long as what flows back and forth across the interface are arbitrary keys (tokens), then the Producer has a some freedom in mapping those keys to underlying Session objects.

 

Eilon

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Freedman [mailto:Michael.Freedman@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 1:23 PM
To: Eilon Reshef
Cc: 'Carsten Leue'; wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org; wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp-wsia] Re: [wsrp-interfaces] RE: [wsia] Sessions

Eilon,
   Can you elaborate on your conclusion that we shouldn't enforce a model?  I am not really sure how we can have our cake and eat it too.  Either our model requires a key or its doesn't or its a hybrid that allows both.  I would prefer not doing that later as it seems messy in the interface (and complicates it).
      -Mike-

Eilon Reshef wrote:

 Carsten and team,Attached are some additional thoughts on sessions - in particular how people may want to use sessions in a different way that I am not sure works very well with our current approach.Eilon

-----Original Message-----
From: Carsten Leue [mailto:cleue@de.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:16 AM
To: wsia; WSRP; wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org; wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsia] Sessions
 

As promised (though a bit late) here is a sketch of my current
understanding of the notion of sessions.

(See attached file: Sessions.zip)

Best regards
Carsten Leue

-------
Dr. Carsten Leue
Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory Böblingen , Germany
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401